A UNIQUE PEOPLE'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE
The purpose of this blog is to serve as a communications center regarding the effort to organize a global research and educational institute (AHA!Institute). It is intended to provide an open opportunity for anyone/everyone to individually and/or collectively participate in such ultimate inquiries as the origin and nature of the universe, life, mind and society and the consequential actional implications of those inquiries for humanity. The AHA!Institute Campus (ribbon cutting in January, 2009) will be the first SyntheticMind-Endowed Virtual University. The enabling technology which makes this mission possible is the ability to extend personal intelligence via the AutoGnome and thus build one's own Synthetic MINDclone in Virtuality (CyberSpace). This personalized AutoGnome, i.e. MyWebGnome, can enhance anyone's chance of an AHA! Discovery, Invention or Creation, in any form, and thereby grow the personal satisfaction, rewards and ownership derived from being a Relational Researcher. The AHA!Institute will harness the Synthetic Intelligence (AutoGnomic)-driven Knowledge Development Platform, “TrueThinker”, and GnosTek’s proprietary “Knowledge Valuing” toolsets to build a robust “Campus” of Relational Systems Researchers and Peripatetic Relational Teachers/Learners.
THE FIRST STEP IN BECOMING A PARTICIPANT IN THIS GLOBAL ENTERPRISE IS TO BECOME A TRUETHINKER BY SUBSCRIBING TO http://www.truethinker.com/ THROUGH REFERRAL FROM THE AHA!INSTITUTE (via http://www.ahainstitute.com/ or http://www.ahainstitute.org/).

Monday, June 16, 2008

Mapping the NEW (VIRTUAL RELATIONAL) WORLD: Foundational/Formal/Theoretical RS Development Outline-Part I {Re:SYN1-Maps}

RELATIONAL SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
- Annotated Outline –
This post, again beginning with the identifier {Re:SYNx-Maps, where x=1to7}, follows our preceding posts, http://relatedone.blogspot.com/2008/05/mapping-new-virtual-relational-world.html


I. NOTIONAL FOUNDATIONS

EXPERIENTIALLY SPECIFIC:
Personal Experience is the Existence of RELATIONAL SYSTEM (RS).

PRESUMPTIVELY GENERAL
:
By Presumption, RS is the Essence of Existence (Non-Existence) Other than Personal

General RS Presumptions:

1. SS (Relational Order 1 or RO1)-MonoRelational;
2. SR (Relational Order 2 or RO2)-BiRelational;
3. RR (Relational Order 3 or RO3)-TriRelational; and
4. R(S)-NESS (Relational Order 0 or RO0)-SelfRelational

General Philosophical Presumptions:

1. Existence <=> Cosmos
from
2. Existence (Non-Existence) <=> CosmiChaos


PRESUMPTIVELY SPECIFIC:

Specific RS Presumptions:

1. IaR (Inter (Actional) Relation) of I (Image) and/or S (SubSumption)

Specific RS Formation Assumptions:

1. Pragmatic Action Methodology (PAM) attending to Extensive Exclusivity while being Occam Simplistic in all RS Formations

2. The Form - OrderDisOrderReOrder (ODORO) - is Necessary & Sufficient in Forming both Relations and Systems in RS Theory Creation

3. RetroSpective Formulations are a vision of a Transhumanist Future Culture/Society imported into current strategic RS Applications Modeling

Philosophical RS Formation Notions:

1. S (Totality or Whole)/Field/Energy-Information

2. sS (Component or Part)/Particle/Atom (with 2 experiential characteristics) (sS corresponds to subSystem)

3. IaR of S's and sS's through I &/or S in SS, SR, RR, or R(S)-NESS

Formal RS Notions:

1. Mathematical: Focused on Multi – I &/or S in RS

2. Logical: Focused on Multi – IaR of I &/or S in RS

Theoretical RS Notions:

1. Heterarcical/Hierarchical Forms: Systemantilectical Resolutions of Systemantic Paradoxes implies a Taxonomy of Levels (…Formalons, Nuclons, Chemons, Bions, Psychons, Socions, GnosTekons,…)

2. Optimum Sytemic (subSystemic) Probability Inference (OS(sS)PI)

EXPERIENTIALLY GENERAL:

1. System - as - Totality
a. RO1 is sufficient

2. System - as - Whole
a. RO3 is necessary since a Whole is not a S (is no-thing)
b. Field is Wholing R of R's
i. Field is Formalized as Max Order of R's (via OS(sS)PI)
ii. Particles are Holographic

The following sections will follow as needed.
II. GENERAL RELATIONAL THEORY CONSTRUCTION

III. A SPECIFIC EXAMPLE OF RELATIONAL THEORY CONSTRUCTION

0 comments: